Competitor profile

M/s Maa Gaytri Construction

They win 53% of what they bid, but only 36% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

17tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹5.7 Cr bid — 35.8% conversion
Win rate
52.9%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
52.9%
47.1%
Awarded952.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost847.1%
By value₹5.7 Cr
35.8%
64.2%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr35.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.7 Cr64.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹2.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHIVSHAKTI CONSTRUCTION4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S VINDHYA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹18.5 L
won head-to-head
03
AMIT KUMAR SINGH2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹21.9 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s Niraj Shukla0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S RNV ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s Chandra Kishor Singh Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedMaa Gaytri awardedOthers

About M/s Maa Gaytri Construction

M/s Maa Gaytri Construction appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 52.9% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Director Cum Chief Engineer RED, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SHIVSHAKTI CONSTRUCTION, M/S VINDHYA CONSTRUCTION and AMIT KUMAR SINGH. SHIVSHAKTI CONSTRUCTION bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M/s Maa Gaytri Construction won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.