Competitor profile

M.R. ENTERPRISES

They win 17% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

37tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
9 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
36
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
26 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.3 Cr
of ₹14.0 Cr bid — 16.5% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 36 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count36 bids
16.7%
11.1%
72.2%
Awarded616.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected411.1%
Lost2672.2%
By value₹14.0 Cr
16.5%
16.4%
67.1%
Awarded₹2.3 Cr16.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.3 Cr16.4%
Lost₹9.4 Cr67.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

6 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
D K Enterprises3 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹50.1 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s HARIOM ENTERPRISES2 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/s A P Management Services5 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹44.6 L
won head-to-head
04
Pooja Enterprises0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/s New Weather0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
PUNDER CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹51.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.R. ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M.R. ENTERPRISES

M.R. ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 36 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹2.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Defence Research and Development Organisation, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against D K Enterprises, M/s HARIOM ENTERPRISES and M/s A P Management Services. D K Enterprises bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M.R. ENTERPRISES won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.