Competitor profile

M. M. Associates

They win 39% of what they bid — and 79% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

28tenders on record
7buyer authorities
1state
18 Feb 2025last award
Total bids
28
28 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
10 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹31.4 Cr
of ₹39.7 Cr bid — 79.1% conversion
Win rate
39.3%
of 28 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count28 bids
39.3%
25.0%
35.7%
Awarded1139.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected725.0%
Lost1035.7%
By value₹39.7 Cr
79.1%
16.4%
Awarded₹31.4 Cr79.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.5 Cr16.4%
Lost₹1.8 Cr4.5%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
J. N. Trading4 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹87,438
won head-to-head
02
BRAHMAPUTRA ASSOCIATES2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹6,980
won head-to-head
03
J.A. ENTERPRISE1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹9,000
won head-to-head
04
NATIONAL SEED FARM0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S. NATIONAL SEED NURSERY3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹536
won head-to-head
06
M/S. R.N.B. ENTERPRISE3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹43,000
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM. M. Associates awardedOthers

About M. M. Associates

M. M. Associates appears as a bidder on 28 government tenders on record, from 7 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 28 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 39.3% win rate — worth ₹31.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Feb 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Welfare of Plain Tribes and Backward Classes, at 64.4% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against J. N. Trading, BRAHMAPUTRA ASSOCIATES and J.A. ENTERPRISE. J. N. Trading bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; M. M. Associates won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.