Competitor profile

M.K ENTERPRISES

They win 33% of what they bid, and 36% of the value they chase.

137tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
6 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
136
137 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
45
83 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.3 Cr
of ₹14.6 Cr bid — 36.5% conversion
Win rate
33.1%
of 136 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count136 bids
33.1%
61.0%
Awarded4533.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected85.9%
Lost8361.0%
By value₹14.6 Cr
36.5%
54.1%
Awarded₹5.3 Cr36.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 Cr9.5%
Lost₹7.9 Cr54.1%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹5.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
A K T ASSOCIATES9 wins · 32 shared tenders
₹36.3 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S NEW KHANNA CONSTRUCTION18 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹51.3 L
won head-to-head
03
Dixit Enterprises11 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S S S ENTERPRISES3 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹93.3 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s M.H. ENTERPRISES9 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹24.7 L
won head-to-head
06
M/s Suvidha Enterprises1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹12.1 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM.K ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M.K ENTERPRISES

M.K ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 137 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 136 decided bids, it was awarded 45 — a 33.1% win rate — worth ₹5.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 6 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U P Irrigation Department (Mechanical), at 70.3% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against A K T ASSOCIATES, M/S NEW KHANNA CONSTRUCTION and Dixit Enterprises. A K T ASSOCIATES bid on 32 of the same tenders and won 9 of them; M.K ENTERPRISES won 23.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.