Competitor profile

M/S M. K. CONSTRUCTION

They win 48% of what they bid, but only 13% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

53tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
9 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
52
53 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
25
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 Cr
of ₹15.3 Cr bid — 12.8% conversion
Win rate
48.1%
of 52 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count52 bids
48.1%
15.4%
36.5%
Awarded2548.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected815.4%
Lost1936.5%
By value₹15.3 Cr
12.8%
38.3%
48.9%
Awarded₹2.0 Cr12.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.9 Cr38.3%
Lost₹7.5 Cr48.9%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹2.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S JAITARA DEVELOPER0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
URMILA DEVI2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹3.2 L
won head-to-head
03
Om Enterprises0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s Chandra Kishor Singh Construction6 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/s Krishna Dev Tripathi1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹23.3 L
won head-to-head
06
m/s mohd. zamil1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM. K. CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S M. K. CONSTRUCTION

M/S M. K. CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 53 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 52 decided bids, it was awarded 25 — a 48.1% win rate — worth ₹2.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U P Irrigation Department (Civil), at 53.2% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S JAITARA DEVELOPER, URMILA DEVI and Om Enterprises. M/S JAITARA DEVELOPER bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S M. K. CONSTRUCTION won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.