Competitor profile

M/s. M G Mane

They win 18% of what they bid, and 18% of the value they chase.

17tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
14 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹12.0 Cr bid — 17.6% conversion
Win rate
17.6%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
17.6%
11.8%
70.6%
Awarded317.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected211.8%
Lost1270.6%
By value₹12.0 Cr
17.6%
22.9%
59.5%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr17.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.8 Cr22.9%
Lost₹7.1 Cr59.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹2.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAVI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
shubham Udyog1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SANJAY CONTRACTOR2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
AMBAJI INFRASTRUCTURE CO0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Pravin Construction0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHINDE ASSOCIATES1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹68.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM G Mane awardedOthers

About M/s. M G Mane

M/s. M G Mane appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 17.6% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 14 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAVI ENTERPRISES, shubham Udyog and SANJAY CONTRACTOR. RAVI ENTERPRISES bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s. M G Mane won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.