Competitor profile

M D TRADE AND SUPPLY

They win 67% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
30 Mar 2024last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2
of ₹1.2 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
66.7%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
66.7%
33.3%
Awarded266.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost133.3%
By value₹1.2 Cr
100.0%
Awarded₹20.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.2 Cr100.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹2

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
PAWAN PRINT HOUSE2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
02
BIJIT SHARMA2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
03
MD ABU NASER2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
04
KAILASH BHUYAN2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
05
M/S P B ENTERPRISE2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
06
M/S Patgiri Trading2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹2
won head-to-head
Rival awardedM D TRADE awardedOthers

About M D TRADE AND SUPPLY

M D TRADE AND SUPPLY appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 66.7% win rate — worth ₹2 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Mar 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Office of the Chief Electoral Officer Assam, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against PAWAN PRINT HOUSE, BIJIT SHARMA and MD ABU NASER. PAWAN PRINT HOUSE bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; M D TRADE AND SUPPLY won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.