Competitor profile

M/s Luxmi Constructions

They win 14% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

97tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
87
97 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
73 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.1 Cr
of ₹44.0 Cr bid — 9.3% conversion
Win rate
13.8%
of 87 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count87 bids
13.8%
83.9%
Awarded1213.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected22.3%
Lost7383.9%
By value₹44.0 Cr
88.5%
Awarded₹4.1 Cr9.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹94.9 L2.2%
Lost₹39.0 Cr88.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

12 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
REYANSH GARG AND COMPANY9 wins · 53 shared tenders
₹1.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s BALDEV SINGH11 wins · 49 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
GUPTA AND ENGINEERS4 wins · 35 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Rasvinderpalandco2 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹22.7 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s BHUPINDRA ENGINEERING WORKS6 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
06
KAY VEE CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 21 shared tenders
₹24.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLuxmi Constructions awardedOthers

About M/s Luxmi Constructions

M/s Luxmi Constructions appears as a bidder on 97 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 87 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 13.8% win rate — worth ₹4.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 14.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against REYANSH GARG AND COMPANY, M/s BALDEV SINGH and GUPTA AND ENGINEERS. REYANSH GARG AND COMPANY bid on 53 of the same tenders and won 9 of them; M/s Luxmi Constructions won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.