Competitor profile

GUPTA AND ENGINEERS

They win 13% of what they bid, and 12% of the value they chase.

57tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
55
57 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
45 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹17.4 Cr bid — 12.1% conversion
Win rate
12.7%
of 55 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count55 bids
12.7%
81.8%
Awarded712.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected35.5%
Lost4581.8%
By value₹17.4 Cr
12.1%
82.3%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr12.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹97.1 L5.6%
Lost₹14.3 Cr82.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

7 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s BALDEV SINGH3 wins · 43 shared tenders
₹99.7 L
won head-to-head
02
REYANSH GARG AND COMPANY8 wins · 40 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/s Luxmi Constructions0 wins · 35 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Rasvinderpalandco3 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹61.0 L
won head-to-head
05
GARG INFRA PROJECTS4 wins · 21 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
KAY VEE CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGUPTA AND ENGINEERS awardedOthers

About GUPTA AND ENGINEERS

GUPTA AND ENGINEERS appears as a bidder on 57 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 55 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 12.7% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 14.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s BALDEV SINGH, REYANSH GARG AND COMPANY and M/s Luxmi Constructions. M/s BALDEV SINGH bid on 43 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; GUPTA AND ENGINEERS won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.