Competitor profile

M/S LALJI CONSTRUCTION

They win 28% of what they bid, and 21% of the value they chase.

26tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
25
26 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
18 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹47.0 L
of ₹2.2 Cr bid — 20.9% conversion
Win rate
28.0%
of 25 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count25 bids
28.0%
72.0%
Awarded728.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1872.0%
By value₹2.2 Cr
20.9%
79.1%
Awarded₹47.0 L20.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.8 Cr79.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹47.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S L.I.M.R.A. CONSTRUCTION11 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹31.3 L
won head-to-head
02
JAI MATA DI ENTERPRISES6 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
RANI SINGH0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
prakash construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S AWADH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MAHARUDRA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLALJI CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S LALJI CONSTRUCTION

M/S LALJI CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 26 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 25 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 28.0% win rate — worth ₹47.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate of Local Bodies UP, at 74.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S L.I.M.R.A. CONSTRUCTION, JAI MATA DI ENTERPRISES and RANI SINGH. M/S L.I.M.R.A. CONSTRUCTION bid on 22 of the same tenders and won 11 of them; M/S LALJI CONSTRUCTION won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.