Competitor profile

LALITA KHATRI-MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS

They win 33% of what they bid — and 99% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
17 Jun 2015last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹79.9 L
of ₹80.4 L bid — 99.4% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected266.7%
Lost00.0%
By value₹80.4 L
99.4%
Awarded₹79.9 L99.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹48,0850.6%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Delhi₹79.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AMIT BHASIN-SUPER MEDICARE AGENCIES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹100
won head-to-head
02
₹100
won head-to-head
03
₹79.9 L
won head-to-head
04
Manav Khindria-APEX SYNERGIES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹100
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLALITA KHATRI-MEDICAL awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to LALITA KHATRI-MEDICAL

About LALITA KHATRI-MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS

LALITA KHATRI-MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹79.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Jun 2015.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Delhi.

It most often bids against AMIT BHASIN-SUPER MEDICARE AGENCIES, Devdutt Bhatia-Rohanika Electronics & Medical Systems and B K Mohanty-Newage Furniture Innovations Pvt. Ltd.. AMIT BHASIN-SUPER MEDICARE AGENCIES bid on 1 of the same tender and won 1 of them; LALITA KHATRI-MEDICAL EQUIPMENT SOLUTIONS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.