Competitor profile

LAL AND SONS

They win 40% of what they bid, but only 21% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

30tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
19 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
30
30 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.5 Cr
of ₹11.9 Cr bid — 21.1% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 30 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count30 bids
40.0%
10.0%
50.0%
Awarded1240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected310.0%
Lost1550.0%
By value₹11.9 Cr
21.1%
16.1%
62.8%
Awarded₹2.5 Cr21.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.9 Cr16.1%
Lost₹7.5 Cr62.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

12 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
TALEWAR MAHATO1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹2.5 L
won head-to-head
02
SHIVKRIPA ENTERPRISES1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹25.9 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S SUDHANSHU SHEKHAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
GOUTAM KUMAR DEY0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
KAMAL KISHORE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S.Kalyani Enterprises0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLAL AND SONS awardedOthers

About LAL AND SONS

LAL AND SONS appears as a bidder on 30 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 30 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹2.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Bharat Coking Coal Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against TALEWAR MAHATO, SHIVKRIPA ENTERPRISES and M/S SUDHANSHU SHEKHAR. TALEWAR MAHATO bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; LAL AND SONS won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.