Competitor profile

LAD AND ASSOCIATE

They win 12% of what they bid — and 37% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

35tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
22 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
34
35 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
21 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.6 Cr
of ₹12.3 Cr bid — 37.3% conversion
Win rate
11.8%
of 34 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count34 bids
11.8%
26.5%
61.8%
Awarded411.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected926.5%
Lost2161.8%
By value₹12.3 Cr
37.3%
20.5%
42.2%
Awarded₹4.6 Cr37.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.5 Cr20.5%
Lost₹5.2 Cr42.2%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹4.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Pavan Quick Service8 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Sarthak Engineers2 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹46.5 L
won head-to-head
03
OM ENTERPRISES0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
PARVATI ELECTRIC ENTERPRISES1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹21.1 L
won head-to-head
05
New Solar Electricals and Electronics1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹8.5 L
won head-to-head
06
Pravin electrical services5 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹96.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedLAD AND ASSOCIATE awardedOthers

About LAD AND ASSOCIATE

LAD AND ASSOCIATE appears as a bidder on 35 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 34 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 11.8% win rate — worth ₹4.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Tourism and Cultural Affairs Dept. Maharashtra, at 97.0% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Pavan Quick Service, Sarthak Engineers and OM ENTERPRISES. Pavan Quick Service bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 8 of them; LAD AND ASSOCIATE won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.