Competitor profile

KUNAL VIDYANAND DAHIWALE

They win 40% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
16 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹34.9 L
of ₹1.0 Cr bid — 34.0% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
40.0%
60.0%
Awarded240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost360.0%
By value₹1.0 Cr
34.0%
66.0%
Awarded₹34.9 L34.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹67.7 L66.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹34.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SOHAIL KHAN1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹18.5 L
won head-to-head
02
Sumit Ravindra Turkar1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹11.2 L
won head-to-head
03
NITIN VASANTA HATWAR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Pankaj Madhukar Humane0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Varsha G Nagphase0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
FAGO RAMAJI PADOLE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKUNAL VIDYANAND awardedOthers

About KUNAL VIDYANAND DAHIWALE

KUNAL VIDYANAND DAHIWALE appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹34.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Agriculture, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SOHAIL KHAN, Sumit Ravindra Turkar and NITIN VASANTA HATWAR. SOHAIL KHAN bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; KUNAL VIDYANAND DAHIWALE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.