Competitor profile

M/S KULDEEP TRADERS

They win 33% of what they bid, and 32% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹4.6 Cr bid — 31.8% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded433.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost866.7%
By value₹4.6 Cr
31.8%
68.2%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr31.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.1 Cr68.2%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹1.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S VINOD KUMAR3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
SHIVAM ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹41.8 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s KHUSHI CONTRACTOR &SUPPLIERS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Vishwajeet Dwivedi1 win · 1 shared tender
₹50.6 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S APARNIKA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S VASUNDHRA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹34.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKULDEEP TRADERS awardedOthers

About M/S KULDEEP TRADERS

M/S KULDEEP TRADERS appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Director Cum Chief Engineer RED, at 54.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S VINOD KUMAR, SHIVAM ENTERPRISES and M/s KHUSHI CONTRACTOR &SUPPLIERS. M/S VINOD KUMAR bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; M/S KULDEEP TRADERS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.