Competitor profile

Kriti Construction

They win 47% of what they bid — and 60% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

17tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
1 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
8
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.9 Cr
of ₹3.2 Cr bid — 59.8% conversion
Win rate
47.1%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count17 bids
47.1%
11.8%
41.2%
Awarded847.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected211.8%
Lost741.2%
By value₹3.2 Cr
59.8%
23.2%
17.0%
Awarded₹1.9 Cr59.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹73.0 L23.2%
Lost₹53.6 L17.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹1.9 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹1.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ranjan Barman0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
HARKUMAR BARMAN0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SAMPA MITRA GOON2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹9.9 L
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
DIPAK GUHA2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹18.8 L
won head-to-head
06
Subhash Chandra Das0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKriti Construction awardedOthers

About Kriti Construction

Kriti Construction appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 8 — a 47.1% win rate — worth ₹1.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Ranjan Barman, HARKUMAR BARMAN and SAMPA MITRA GOON. Ranjan Barman bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Kriti Construction won 8.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.