Competitor profile

krishnasecuirty and management service

They win 8% of what they bid, and 0.2% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
1 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
12
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 L
of ₹4.6 Cr bid — 0.2% conversion
Win rate
8.3%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
58.3%
33.3%
Awarded18.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected758.3%
Lost433.3%
By value₹4.6 Cr
94.5%
Awarded₹1.1 L0.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.3 Cr94.5%
Lost₹24.0 L5.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹1.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s GUPTA CONTRACTROS0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHREE BALAJI AND COMPANY2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹34,249
won head-to-head
03
SARJEET SWAMI3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹2.1 L
won head-to-head
04
Sunil House Keeping1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹64,737
won head-to-head
05
MJ ENTERPRISES1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹63,937
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedkrishnasecuirty awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to krishnasecuirty

About krishnasecuirty and management service

krishnasecuirty and management service appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 8.3% win rate — worth ₹1.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of College Education, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s GUPTA CONTRACTROS, SHREE BALAJI AND COMPANY and SARJEET SWAMI. M/s GUPTA CONTRACTROS bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; krishnasecuirty and management service won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.