Competitor profile

M/s GUPTA CONTRACTROS

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 9% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

92tenders on record
19buyer authorities
1state
8 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
90
92 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
45
41 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.3 Cr
of ₹25.3 Cr bid — 9.3% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 90 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count90 bids
50.0%
45.6%
Awarded4550.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected44.4%
Lost4145.6%
By value₹25.3 Cr
28.0%
62.7%
Awarded₹2.3 Cr9.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹7.1 Cr28.0%
Lost₹15.9 Cr62.7%

Where they win

11 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹2.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Dhanu Enterprises6 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹26.3 L
won head-to-head
02
M/s Deepak Enterprises6 wins · 18 shared tenders
₹78.0 L
won head-to-head
03
NITYA ENTERPRISES5 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹40.5 L
won head-to-head
04
₹1.4 L
won head-to-head
05
PRAHRI DIIVINE SECURITY SERVICES3 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹27,294
won head-to-head
06
G.S. and Comapny4 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGUPTA CONTRACTROS awardedOthers

About M/s GUPTA CONTRACTROS

M/s GUPTA CONTRACTROS appears as a bidder on 92 government tenders on record, from 19 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 90 decided bids, it was awarded 45 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹2.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is S.M.S. Medical College-Jaipur, at 72.2% of what it has won, out of 11 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Dhanu Enterprises, M/s Deepak Enterprises and NITYA ENTERPRISES. Dhanu Enterprises bid on 20 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; M/s GUPTA CONTRACTROS won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.