Competitor profile

KMS CONSTRUCTION

They win 10% of what they bid, and 9% of the value they chase.

40tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
30 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
40
40 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
36 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹38.7 L
of ₹4.3 Cr bid — 9.1% conversion
Win rate
10.0%
of 40 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count40 bids
10.0%
90.0%
Awarded410.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost3690.0%
By value₹4.3 Cr
90.9%
Awarded₹38.7 L9.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.9 Cr90.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
C. KANDASAMY7 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹26.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Abdul Gafoor3 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹25.3 L
won head-to-head
03
M KARIKALAN1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹10.6 L
won head-to-head
04
RAM CHANDRA MONDAL1 win · 9 shared tenders
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
05
AJAY KUMAR SHUKLA3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹41.9 L
won head-to-head
06
CRESCENT CONSTRUCTION1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹6.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKMS CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About KMS CONSTRUCTION

KMS CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 40 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 40 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 10.0% win rate — worth ₹38.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DIRECTORATE OF RD PRIS and ULBS, at 73.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Andaman And Nicobar. On priced bids, its median quote is 9.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against C. KANDASAMY, Abdul Gafoor and M KARIKALAN. C. KANDASAMY bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 7 of them; KMS CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.