Competitor profile

Klorofil Scientific

They win 71% of what they bid — and 91% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

17tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.3 Cr
of ₹3.6 Cr bid — 90.9% conversion
Win rate
70.6%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count17 bids
70.6%
17.6%
11.8%
Awarded1270.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected317.6%
Lost211.8%
By value₹3.6 Cr
90.9%
Awarded₹3.3 Cr90.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹14.3 L4.0%
Lost₹18.5 L5.1%

Where they win

5 authorities · 1 state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Kea Enterprises1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.2 L
won head-to-head
02
HOVERLABS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Shruti Vatrana0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Eppendorf India Limited0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Amrit Kaur Mann0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
INVENTIS TECHNOSYS PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKlorofil Scientific awardedOthers

About Klorofil Scientific

Klorofil Scientific appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 70.6% win rate — worth ₹3.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Health and Family Welfare, at 39.5% of what it has won, out of 5 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Kea Enterprises, HOVERLABS and Shruti Vatrana. Kea Enterprises bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Klorofil Scientific won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.