Competitor profile

Kirti Construction

They win 39% of what they bid, but only 23% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

46tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
10 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
44
46 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹9.0 Cr bid — 23.4% conversion
Win rate
38.6%
of 44 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count44 bids
38.6%
31.8%
29.5%
Awarded1738.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1431.8%
Lost1329.5%
By value₹9.0 Cr
23.4%
56.3%
20.3%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr23.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.1 Cr56.3%
Lost₹1.8 Cr20.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai₹2.1 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹2.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
H M Enterprises6 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹94.5 L
won head-to-head
02
Shree Shivshakti Enterprises8 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
S.K. DEVELOPERS0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
JANVI CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
VINAYAK ENTERPRISES0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s Vihaan Enterprises0 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKirti Construction awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Kirti Construction

About Kirti Construction

Kirti Construction appears as a bidder on 46 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 44 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 38.6% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against H M Enterprises, Shree Shivshakti Enterprises and S.K. DEVELOPERS. H M Enterprises bid on 29 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; Kirti Construction won 16.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.