Competitor profile

Khanna Paper

They win 50% of what they bid, but only <0.1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
15 Mar 2018last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹61,200
of ₹66.8 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected150.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹66.8 Cr
100.0%
Awarded₹61,2000.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹66.8 Cr100.0%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹61,200

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHAH PAPER MILLS LIMITED2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹66.8 Cr
won head-to-head
02
N R Agarwal Industries Ltd.2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹66.8 Cr
won head-to-head
03
SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED1 win · 1 shared tender
₹66.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
Trident Limited1 win · 1 shared tender
₹66.8 Cr
won head-to-head
05
DSG Papers Pvt Ltd0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
K R PULP AND PAPERS LTD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKhanna Paper awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Khanna Paper

About Khanna Paper

Khanna Paper appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹61,200 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Mar 2018.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Elementary Education Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHAH PAPER MILLS LIMITED, N R Agarwal Industries Ltd. and SATIA INDUSTRIES LIMITED. SHAH PAPER MILLS LIMITED bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; Khanna Paper won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.