Competitor profile

Kathir Marketing Services

They win 11% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

65tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
12 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
65
65 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
49 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.2 Cr
of ₹32.8 Cr bid — 9.8% conversion
Win rate
10.8%
of 65 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count65 bids
10.8%
13.8%
75.4%
Awarded710.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected913.8%
Lost4975.4%
By value₹32.8 Cr
19.1%
71.1%
Awarded₹3.2 Cr9.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.3 Cr19.1%
Lost₹23.3 Cr71.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

7 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Pooja Enterprises1 win · 33 shared tenders
₹49.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Allied Trading Company1 win · 29 shared tenders
₹4.9 L
won head-to-head
03
bansal construction1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹47.4 L
won head-to-head
04
Tropical Refrigeration5 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹2.1 Cr
won head-to-head
05
A. R. ELECTRICALS4 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
06
SKY GROUP4 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKathir Marketing awardedOthers

About Kathir Marketing Services

Kathir Marketing Services appears as a bidder on 65 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 65 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 10.8% win rate — worth ₹3.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Pooja Enterprises, Allied Trading Company and bansal construction. M/s Pooja Enterprises bid on 33 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Kathir Marketing Services won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.