Competitor profile

KARTIKI ENTERPRISES

They win 1% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

82tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
1 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
81
82 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
57 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.8 L
of ₹7.8 Cr bid — 1.9% conversion
Win rate
1.2%
of 81 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count81 bids
28.4%
70.4%
Awarded11.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2328.4%
Lost5770.4%
By value₹7.8 Cr
45.0%
53.1%
Awarded₹14.8 L1.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.5 Cr45.0%
Lost₹4.2 Cr53.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹14.8 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹14.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAGAR CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 25 shared tenders
₹42.1 L
won head-to-head
02
Amar Rohidas Devade3 wins · 24 shared tenders
₹10.8 L
won head-to-head
03
RAJKUMAR CONSTRUCTION1 win · 19 shared tenders
₹5.3 L
won head-to-head
04
SHRIRAM DEVELOPERS2 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹7.1 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S.K.M.PATIL0 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Ashish Sham Dhotre0 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKARTIKI ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About KARTIKI ENTERPRISES

KARTIKI ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 82 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 81 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 1.2% win rate — worth ₹14.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 15.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAGAR CONSTRUCTION, Amar Rohidas Devade and RAJKUMAR CONSTRUCTION. SAGAR CONSTRUCTION bid on 25 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; KARTIKI ENTERPRISES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.