Competitor profile

M/S Kartik Enterprises

They win 21% of what they bid, and 20% of the value they chase.

33tenders on record
10buyer authorities
1state
27 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
33
33 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
24 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹96.3 L
of ₹4.9 Cr bid — 19.5% conversion
Win rate
21.2%
of 33 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count33 bids
21.2%
72.7%
Awarded721.2%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected26.1%
Lost2472.7%
By value₹4.9 Cr
19.5%
21.8%
58.7%
Awarded₹96.3 L19.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.1 Cr21.8%
Lost₹2.9 Cr58.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-NAGPUR₹21.8 L22.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹96.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SAI BHAVANI TRADERS0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Harish D Metangale3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹29.9 L
won head-to-head
03
Rishab Vinayakrao Mankar0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RUSHIKESH JAYKUMAR PAWAR4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹99,700
won head-to-head
05
Pritam D Rewatkar0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DIPTI N MADKE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKartik Enterprises awardedOthers

About M/S Kartik Enterprises

M/S Kartik Enterprises appears as a bidder on 33 government tenders on record, from 10 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 33 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 21.2% win rate — worth ₹96.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Panvel Municipal Corporation, at 77.3% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SAI BHAVANI TRADERS, Harish D Metangale and Rishab Vinayakrao Mankar. M/S SAI BHAVANI TRADERS bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S Kartik Enterprises won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.