Competitor profile

M/S KAPIL ENTERPRISES

They win 25% of what they bid — and 36% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

16tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
29 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹39.1 Cr
of ₹109.5 Cr bid — 35.7% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded425.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1275.0%
By value₹109.5 Cr
35.7%
64.3%
Awarded₹39.1 Cr35.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹70.4 Cr64.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹39.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Goodhill Builders0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHUBHAM BUILDERS1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹7.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
DYNASTY PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Riddhi Infrastructure0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
PARAS CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹15.4 Cr
won head-to-head
06
M/s PULKIT KUMAR BUILDERS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKAPIL ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S KAPIL ENTERPRISES

M/S KAPIL ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹39.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority, at 80.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Goodhill Builders, SHUBHAM BUILDERS and DYNASTY PROMOTERS PRIVATE LIMITED. M/s Goodhill Builders bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S KAPIL ENTERPRISES won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.