Competitor profile

M/s Kanika Enterprises

They win 3% of what they bid, and 3% of the value they chase.

36tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
12 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
32
36 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹55.0 L
of ₹21.7 Cr bid — 2.5% conversion
Win rate
3.1%
of 32 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count32 bids
59.4%
37.5%
Awarded13.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1959.4%
Lost1237.5%
By value₹21.7 Cr
53.7%
43.7%
Awarded₹55.0 L2.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹11.6 Cr53.7%
Lost₹9.5 Cr43.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RES - Chief Engineer₹55.0 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹55.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
GARG CONSTRUCTION1 win · 23 shared tenders
₹55.0 L
won head-to-head
02
M/S PREETAM SHARMA1 win · 23 shared tenders
₹33.9 L
won head-to-head
03
₹91.5 L
won head-to-head
04
indian trading company0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RIJWAN ALI1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
06
Sanjeev Arya1 win · 16 shared tenders
₹30.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKanika Enterprises awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Kanika Enterprises

About M/s Kanika Enterprises

M/s Kanika Enterprises appears as a bidder on 36 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 32 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 3.1% win rate — worth ₹55.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RES - Chief Engineer, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 20.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against GARG CONSTRUCTION, M/S PREETAM SHARMA and M/s Janta Construction House, Prop. Mohd. Akram. GARG CONSTRUCTION bid on 23 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s Kanika Enterprises won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.