Competitor profile

GARG CONSTRUCTION

They win 9% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

58tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
27 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
53
58 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
18 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.4 Cr
of ₹28.8 Cr bid — 8.3% conversion
Win rate
9.4%
of 53 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count53 bids
56.6%
34.0%
Awarded59.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected3056.6%
Lost1834.0%
By value₹28.8 Cr
55.8%
35.9%
Awarded₹2.4 Cr8.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹16.1 Cr55.8%
Lost₹10.4 Cr35.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹2.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S PREETAM SHARMA2 wins · 47 shared tenders
₹85.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Sanjeev Arya1 win · 34 shared tenders
₹30.5 L
won head-to-head
03
indian trading company3 wins · 25 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹91.5 L
won head-to-head
05
M/s Kanika Enterprises1 win · 23 shared tenders
₹55.0 L
won head-to-head
06
RIJWAN ALI1 win · 22 shared tenders
₹72.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGARG CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About GARG CONSTRUCTION

GARG CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 58 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 53 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 9.4% win rate — worth ₹2.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 27 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RES - Chief Engineer, at 56.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S PREETAM SHARMA, Sanjeev Arya and indian trading company. M/S PREETAM SHARMA bid on 47 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; GARG CONSTRUCTION won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.