Competitor profile

M/s Kamrul Construction

They win 8% of what they bid, and 12% of the value they chase.

79tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
3 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
78
79 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
49 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹38.2 L
of ₹3.2 Cr bid — 11.8% conversion
Win rate
7.7%
of 78 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count78 bids
29.5%
62.8%
Awarded67.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2329.5%
Lost4962.8%
By value₹3.2 Cr
11.8%
28.0%
60.2%
Awarded₹38.2 L11.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹90.4 L28.0%
Lost₹1.9 Cr60.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

6 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S S. Z. Brothers & Company40 wins · 63 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Ayan Enterprises12 wins · 38 shared tenders
₹38.6 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S MD IBRAHIM4 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹14.4 L
won head-to-head
04
HIRAMAN MAHTO1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹3.2 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S VISHAL ENTERPRISES0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SEMCO ENGINEERING WORKS0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKamrul Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Kamrul Construction

M/s Kamrul Construction appears as a bidder on 79 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 78 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 7.7% win rate — worth ₹38.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S S. Z. Brothers & Company, Ayan Enterprises and M/S MD IBRAHIM. M/S S. Z. Brothers & Company bid on 63 of the same tenders and won 40 of them; M/s Kamrul Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.