Competitor profile

HIRAMAN MAHTO

They win 8% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

64tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
29 May 2026last award
Total bids
64
64 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
34 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.9 L
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 7.9% conversion
Win rate
7.8%
of 64 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count64 bids
39.1%
53.1%
Awarded57.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected2539.1%
Lost3453.1%
By value₹2.0 Cr
39.4%
52.7%
Awarded₹15.9 L7.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹79.4 L39.4%
Lost₹1.1 Cr52.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

5 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S S. Z. Brothers & Company24 wins · 62 shared tenders
₹76.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Ayan Enterprises29 wins · 53 shared tenders
₹80.5 L
won head-to-head
03
M/s Kamrul Construction0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s Achal Electricals2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹7.6 L
won head-to-head
05
TRIBHUWAN ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S COALFIELD AUTO ENGINEERING WORKS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHIRAMAN MAHTO awardedOthers

About HIRAMAN MAHTO

HIRAMAN MAHTO appears as a bidder on 64 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 64 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 7.8% win rate — worth ₹15.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S S. Z. Brothers & Company, Ayan Enterprises and M/s Kamrul Construction. M/S S. Z. Brothers & Company bid on 62 of the same tenders and won 24 of them; HIRAMAN MAHTO won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.