Competitor profile

KAMLESH CHAUDHARY

They win 50% of what they bid — and 74% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
5 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹70.3 L
of ₹95.2 L bid — 73.8% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count4 bids
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹95.2 L
73.8%
13.3%
12.8%
Awarded₹70.3 L73.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹12.7 L13.3%
Lost₹12.2 L12.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹70.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S H.M.K. CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
₹12.2 L
won head-to-head
03
GARIMA INFRASTRUCTURE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹12.7 L
won head-to-head
04
M/S HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
KOHINOOR CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKAMLESH CHAUDHARY awardedOthers

About KAMLESH CHAUDHARY

KAMLESH CHAUDHARY appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹70.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U.P. State Construction and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd., at 69.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S H.M.K. CONSTRUCTION, M/S MAA LAKSHMI CONSTRUCTION AND COMPANY and GARIMA INFRASTRUCTURE. M/S H.M.K. CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; KAMLESH CHAUDHARY won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.