Competitor profile

KALIMATA CONSTRUCTION

They win 46% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

37tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
37
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹60.8 L
of ₹1.4 Cr bid — 42.0% conversion
Win rate
46.0%
of 37 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count37 bids
45.9%
51.4%
Awarded1745.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected12.7%
Lost1951.4%
By value₹1.4 Cr
42.0%
11.1%
46.9%
Awarded₹60.8 L42.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹16.0 L11.1%
Lost₹67.8 L46.9%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹17.1 L28.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹60.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MAA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SIDDHESWAR DHARA5 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹9.0 L
won head-to-head
03
BHRAMAN CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S NEW KALIMATA HARDWARE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S ANJALI BUILDERS AND CONSTRUCTION1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹7.0 L
won head-to-head
06
BHATTACHARYA FURNITURE & CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKALIMATA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About KALIMATA CONSTRUCTION

KALIMATA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 37 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 46.0% win rate — worth ₹60.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS DEPARTMENT, at 71.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against MAA CONSTRUCTION, SIDDHESWAR DHARA and BHRAMAN CONSTRUCTION. MAA CONSTRUCTION bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; KALIMATA CONSTRUCTION won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.