Competitor profile

JUGAL SARMAH

They win 43% of what they bid, and 36% of the value they chase.

7tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
19 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹75.3 L
of ₹2.1 Cr bid — 36.4% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
42.9%
28.6%
28.6%
Awarded342.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected228.6%
Lost228.6%
By value₹2.1 Cr
36.4%
14.5%
49.1%
Awarded₹75.3 L36.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹30.0 L14.5%
Lost₹1.0 Cr49.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Irrigation Department₹75.3 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹75.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MUKUT SAIKIA3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹70.4 L
won head-to-head
02
ATUL HAZARIKA2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹56.3 L
won head-to-head
03
LABANYA DAS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹56.3 L
won head-to-head
04
PUTUL ALI1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹45.4 L
won head-to-head
05
Arun Enterprise1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1
won head-to-head
06
MANOJ KR GOSWAMI2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹51.2 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJUGAL SARMAH awardedOthers

About JUGAL SARMAH

JUGAL SARMAH appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹75.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Irrigation Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MUKUT SAIKIA, ATUL HAZARIKA and LABANYA DAS. MUKUT SAIKIA bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; JUGAL SARMAH won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.