Competitor profile

JUDPE SUPPLIERS

They win 14% of what they bid, but only 2% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

7tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
1 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 L
of ₹66.0 L bid — 2.1% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
57.1%
28.6%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected457.1%
Lost228.6%
By value₹66.0 L
94.2%
Awarded₹1.4 L2.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹62.1 L94.2%
Lost₹2.4 L3.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Nagpur Municipal Corporation Nagpur₹1.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAIQUA FISH CO0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
KAILASH CHANDRA MATSHYA BEEJ UTPADAN0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ASHRAFI ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹75,000
won head-to-head
04
Malhar Fish Enterprises2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹15.2 L
won head-to-head
05
Aapki Khushi Mein Hamari Khushi Enterprises0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
AQWAY AQUACULTURE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJUDPE SUPPLIERS awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to JUDPE SUPPLIERS

About JUDPE SUPPLIERS

JUDPE SUPPLIERS appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹1.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nagpur Municipal Corporation Nagpur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SAIQUA FISH CO, KAILASH CHANDRA MATSHYA BEEJ UTPADAN and ASHRAFI ENTERPRISES. SAIQUA FISH CO bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; JUDPE SUPPLIERS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.