Competitor profile

JITESH J. KAMAT

They win 44% of what they bid, and 43% of the value they chase.

17tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
3 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
16
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹78.6 L
of ₹1.8 Cr bid — 42.9% conversion
Win rate
43.8%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count16 bids
43.8%
56.3%
Awarded743.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost956.3%
By value₹1.8 Cr
42.9%
57.1%
Awarded₹78.6 L42.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.0 Cr57.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Goa₹78.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
LAXIMAN N NAIK1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹25.1 L
won head-to-head
02
₹17.1 L
won head-to-head
03
SAROJ KUMAR CHOWDHARY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s Devki Infrastructures1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.3 L
won head-to-head
05
SURESH CHELLAPAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Ashok Maruti Harijan0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJITESH J. KAMAT awardedOthers

About JITESH J. KAMAT

JITESH J. KAMAT appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 43.8% win rate — worth ₹78.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, at 64.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Goa. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against LAXIMAN N NAIK, HARILAXMI CONSTRUCTIONS AND POWER (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED and SAROJ KUMAR CHOWDHARY. LAXIMAN N NAIK bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; JITESH J. KAMAT won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.