Competitor profile

JAGDEEP SINGH

They win 19% of what they bid, and 12% of the value they chase.

16tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
30 Nov 2023last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹11.6 Cr bid — 12.4% conversion
Win rate
18.8%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count16 bids
18.8%
81.3%
Awarded318.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1381.3%
Lost00.0%
By value₹11.6 Cr
12.4%
87.6%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr12.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.1 Cr87.6%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE-HOD₹32.8 L22.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹1.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
JABAR SINGH9 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹4.5 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M /S NATHI LAL UNIYAL0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S BAHUGUNA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S DIGVIJAY0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
daya sankar baluni0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Dheerpal Singh Rawat0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJAGDEEP SINGH awardedOthers

About JAGDEEP SINGH

JAGDEEP SINGH appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 18.8% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Nov 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 77.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against JABAR SINGH, M /S NATHI LAL UNIYAL and M/S BAHUGUNA CONSTRUCTION. JABAR SINGH bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 9 of them; JAGDEEP SINGH won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.