Competitor profile

Havard Industries

They win 83% of what they bid, but only 25% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
31 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹65.9 L
of ₹2.6 Cr bid — 25.4% conversion
Win rate
83.3%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
83.3%
16.7%
Awarded583.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost116.7%
By value₹2.6 Cr
25.4%
74.6%
Awarded₹65.9 L25.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.9 Cr74.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹65.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
HIMNOVA INSTRUMENTS AND CHEMICALS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Star Laboratories0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Grain Care Technologies0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Kisan Health Foods0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
BHUPATI ENGINEERING0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Noble Xpurtise0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHavard Industries awardedOthers

About Havard Industries

Havard Industries appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 83.3% win rate — worth ₹65.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Punjab Agricultural University, at 67.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against HIMNOVA INSTRUMENTS AND CHEMICALS, Star Laboratories and Grain Care Technologies. HIMNOVA INSTRUMENTS AND CHEMICALS bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Havard Industries won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.