Competitor profile

HARI SAI ENTERPRISES

They win 48% of what they bid, and 39% of the value they chase.

26tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
2 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
25
26 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
9 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.7 Cr
of ₹17.4 Cr bid — 38.6% conversion
Win rate
48.0%
of 25 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count25 bids
48.0%
16.0%
36.0%
Awarded1248.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected416.0%
Lost936.0%
By value₹17.4 Cr
38.6%
34.0%
27.4%
Awarded₹6.7 Cr38.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹5.9 Cr34.0%
Lost₹4.8 Cr27.4%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹5.9 Cr87.7%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹6.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
YASH DHANANJAY KAMODKAR6 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹2.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Krishnakant Murlidhar Khond2 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
KETAN ULHAS BODKE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
NITIN AMRUT BIDE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M S Industries0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
NATH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHARI SAI ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About HARI SAI ENTERPRISES

HARI SAI ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 26 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 25 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 48.0% win rate — worth ₹6.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 87.7% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against YASH DHANANJAY KAMODKAR, Krishnakant Murlidhar Khond and KETAN ULHAS BODKE. YASH DHANANJAY KAMODKAR bid on 19 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; HARI SAI ENTERPRISES won 11.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.