Competitor profile

Haneef Ibrahim

They win 24% of what they bid, and 20% of the value they chase.

17tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
10 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹29.8 L
of ₹1.5 Cr bid — 20.0% conversion
Win rate
23.5%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
23.5%
76.5%
Awarded423.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1376.5%
By value₹1.5 Cr
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded₹29.8 L20.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.2 Cr80.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MUNICIPAL COUNCILS₹18.3 L61.5%

Operating states

LowHigh
Goa₹29.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S OM CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Supraj S Naik Tari1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹11.6 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S RANJANA CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.3 L
won head-to-head
04
R P SOUZA AND COMPANY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
BRITISH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s De Souza Construction1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹8.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedHaneef Ibrahim awardedOthers

About Haneef Ibrahim

Haneef Ibrahim appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 23.5% win rate — worth ₹29.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MUNICIPAL COUNCILS, at 61.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Goa. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S OM CONSTRUCTIONS, Supraj S Naik Tari and M/S RANJANA CONSTRUCTIONS. M/S OM CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Haneef Ibrahim won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.