Competitor profile

GURUPRASAD SABAJI NARVEKAR

They win 20% of what they bid, and 24% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
7 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹31.4 L
of ₹1.3 Cr bid — 24.1% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded220.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost880.0%
By value₹1.3 Cr
24.1%
75.9%
Awarded₹31.4 L24.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹98.6 L75.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹31.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Amit Electricals5 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹41.1 L
won head-to-head
02
KRANTI ELECTRICALS1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹21.2 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S PHOENIX ELECTROSYSTEMS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S KOHINOOR ELECTRICALS1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹9.9 L
won head-to-head
05
YASHOMANGAL ELECTRICS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHREE MAHAPURUSH ELECTRICALS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹20.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGURUPRASAD awardedOthers

About GURUPRASAD SABAJI NARVEKAR

GURUPRASAD SABAJI NARVEKAR appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹31.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Department Mantralaya, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Amit Electricals, KRANTI ELECTRICALS and M/S PHOENIX ELECTROSYSTEMS. Amit Electricals bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 5 of them; GURUPRASAD SABAJI NARVEKAR won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.