Competitor profile

GURUDEV TRADERS

They win 82% of what they bid, but only 29% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

11tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
8 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
11
11 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.3 Cr
of ₹4.7 Cr bid — 28.5% conversion
Win rate
81.8%
of 11 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count11 bids
81.8%
Awarded981.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected19.1%
Lost19.1%
By value₹4.7 Cr
28.5%
52.2%
19.3%
Awarded₹1.3 Cr28.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.5 Cr52.2%
Lost₹91.3 L19.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KINA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Ali Construction0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S Jitendra Manoj Patil0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Naresh Dharmaji Hirve0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Ashapura Construction Co.0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Madhurani Enterprises1 win · 1 shared tender
₹82.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGURUDEV TRADERS awardedOthers

About GURUDEV TRADERS

GURUDEV TRADERS appears as a bidder on 11 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 11 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 81.8% win rate — worth ₹1.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against KINA ENTERPRISES, Ali Construction and M/S Jitendra Manoj Patil. KINA ENTERPRISES bid on 9 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; GURUDEV TRADERS won 9.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.