Competitor profile

GURU NANAK WOOD AND CHARCOAL

They win 31% of what they bid — and 53% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

16tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
8 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
16
16 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.0 Cr
of ₹11.4 Cr bid — 52.8% conversion
Win rate
31.3%
of 16 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count16 bids
31.3%
68.8%
Awarded531.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1168.8%
By value₹11.4 Cr
52.8%
47.2%
Awarded₹6.0 Cr52.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹5.4 Cr47.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹6.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ajaib Singh Saw Mill8 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
RUPAL SAW MILL MAUR MANDI11 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
03
HARNEK SAW MILL5 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹45.8 L
won head-to-head
04
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M.S VIJAY KUMAR AND SONS7 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
JUGALKISHOREAGGARWALSAWMILLS9 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹8.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGURU NANAK awardedOthers

About GURU NANAK WOOD AND CHARCOAL

GURU NANAK WOOD AND CHARCOAL appears as a bidder on 16 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 16 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 31.3% win rate — worth ₹6.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Forests and Wildlife Preservation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Punjab.

It most often bids against Ajaib Singh Saw Mill, RUPAL SAW MILL MAUR MANDI and HARNEK SAW MILL. Ajaib Singh Saw Mill bid on 14 of the same tenders and won 8 of them; GURU NANAK WOOD AND CHARCOAL won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.