Competitor profile

M/s Guru kripa traders

They win 60% of what they bid, but only 6% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

5tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
28 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.9 L
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 6.3% conversion
Win rate
60.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
60.0%
40.0%
Awarded360.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected240.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹1.9 Cr
93.7%
Awarded₹11.9 L6.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.8 Cr93.7%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

ICDS - Director₹16,5001.4%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹11.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS SONA RAM LICHHMAN RAM0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
VISHNU ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹16,990
won head-to-head
03
M/S SHRI BALAJI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
universal creation0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹13,978
won head-to-head
06
M/S HEMRAJ CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹60.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGuru kripa awardedOthers

About M/s Guru kripa traders

M/s Guru kripa traders appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 60.0% win rate — worth ₹11.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Panchayati Raj Department, at 98.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MS SONA RAM LICHHMAN RAM, VISHNU ENTERPRISES and M/S SHRI BALAJI ENTERPRISES. MS SONA RAM LICHHMAN RAM bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Guru kripa traders won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.