Competitor profile

GURU KIRPA TRADING

They win 41% of what they bid, and 42% of the value they chase.

32tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
30 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
32
32 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
13
13 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹63.8 L
of ₹1.5 Cr bid — 42.0% conversion
Win rate
40.6%
of 32 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count32 bids
40.6%
18.8%
40.6%
Awarded1340.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected618.8%
Lost1340.6%
By value₹1.5 Cr
42.0%
22.2%
35.8%
Awarded₹63.8 L42.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹33.7 L22.2%
Lost₹54.5 L35.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹63.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
R.R. Enterprises3 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹15.4 L
won head-to-head
02
CHHOTE LAL PLANTATION0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Lotus construction Co.1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹1.1 L
won head-to-head
04
KAKA RAM0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
GARDEN CENTRE NURSERY3 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹11.7 L
won head-to-head
06
GURWAAN CONTRACTORS1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGURU KIRPA awardedOthers

About GURU KIRPA TRADING

GURU KIRPA TRADING appears as a bidder on 32 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 32 decided bids, it was awarded 13 — a 40.6% win rate — worth ₹63.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against R.R. Enterprises, CHHOTE LAL PLANTATION and Lotus construction Co.. R.R. Enterprises bid on 12 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; GURU KIRPA TRADING won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.