Competitor profile

GURU KIRPA &CO.

They win 46% of what they bid — and 59% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

37tenders on record
6buyer authorities
1state
8 May 2026last award
Total bids
37
37 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
15 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹11.9 Cr
of ₹20.1 Cr bid — 59.3% conversion
Win rate
46.0%
of 37 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count37 bids
45.9%
13.5%
40.5%
Awarded1745.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected513.5%
Lost1540.5%
By value₹20.1 Cr
59.3%
33.7%
Awarded₹11.9 Cr59.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 Cr7.0%
Lost₹6.8 Cr33.7%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹11.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUBODH BATISH2 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹46.2 L
won head-to-head
02
GIAN CHAND SHARMA4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Jatinder Kumar1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹28.8 L
won head-to-head
04
PUSHPAK CONSTRUCTIONS (REGD.)0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
GLISTEN2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹74.8 L
won head-to-head
06
Bansal Generations Limited1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹34.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGURU KIRPA awardedOthers

About GURU KIRPA &CO.

GURU KIRPA &CO. appears as a bidder on 37 government tenders on record, from 6 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 37 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 46.0% win rate — worth ₹11.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Rural Development and Panchayats, at 74.0% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SUBODH BATISH, GIAN CHAND SHARMA and Jatinder Kumar. SUBODH BATISH bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; GURU KIRPA &CO. won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.