Competitor profile

Guru Construction Works

They win 80% of what they bid, and 85% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
16 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.2 L
of ₹16.7 L bid — 85.0% conversion
Win rate
80.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count5 bids
80.0%
20.0%
Awarded480.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost120.0%
By value₹16.7 L
85.0%
15.0%
Awarded₹14.2 L85.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.5 L15.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹14.2 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S RINKU CONTRACTOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Rajendra and Brothers0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S ASIF ALI & ASSOCIATES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S TRIPLE R CONSTRUCTION AND SUPLIERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SON VIR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGuru Construction awardedOthers

About Guru Construction Works

Guru Construction Works appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 80.0% win rate — worth ₹14.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U P Irrigation Department (Civil), at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Sanjiv Kumar Chaturvedi contructor and Supplier, M/S RINKU CONTRACTOR and Rajendra and Brothers. Sanjiv Kumar Chaturvedi contructor and Supplier bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Guru Construction Works won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.