Competitor profile

GURNAM SINGH CONTRACTOR

They win 48% of what they bid, and 41% of the value they chase.

23tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
26 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
23
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
11
12 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 Cr
of ₹4.8 Cr bid — 41.2% conversion
Win rate
47.8%
of 23 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count23 bids
47.8%
52.2%
Awarded1147.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1252.2%
By value₹4.8 Cr
41.2%
58.8%
Awarded₹2.0 Cr41.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.8 Cr58.8%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹2.0 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHIV KUMAR CONTRACTOR0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
CHAMKOR SINGH MEEN CONTRACTOR1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹17.1 L
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/s Brother Buildcon0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Dhan Lakshmi Enterprises2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹21.3 L
won head-to-head
06
AGGARWAL CONTRACTORS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹34.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGURNAM SINGH awardedOthers

About GURNAM SINGH CONTRACTOR

GURNAM SINGH CONTRACTOR appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 23 decided bids, it was awarded 11 — a 47.8% win rate — worth ₹2.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Rural Development and Panchayats, at 86.7% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHIV KUMAR CONTRACTOR, CHAMKOR SINGH MEEN CONTRACTOR and THE KAMOMAJRA CO OPERATIVE LABOUR AND CONSTRUCTION SOCIETY LIMITED. SHIV KUMAR CONTRACTOR bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; GURNAM SINGH CONTRACTOR won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.