Competitor profile

M/S GOODWILL SUPPLIERS

They win 25% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
0states
13 Dec 2023last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹29.1 Cr
of ₹92.6 Cr bid — 31.4% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count8 bids
25.0%
50.0%
25.0%
Awarded225.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected450.0%
Lost225.0%
By value₹92.6 Cr
31.4%
44.6%
24.0%
Awarded₹29.1 Cr31.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹41.3 Cr44.6%
Lost₹22.3 Cr24.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

CE-RD-AR₹14.5 Cr49.8%

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S H.B ENTERPRISES0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
TAYO ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹17.0 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/s Yuma Enterprises0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAGIA KU ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
B.M.Enterprises0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGOODWILL SUPPLIERS awardedOthers

About M/S GOODWILL SUPPLIERS

M/S GOODWILL SUPPLIERS appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹29.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Dec 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is State Quality Coordinator and Empowered Officer, at 50.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S H.B ENTERPRISES, TAYO ENTERPRISES and M/s Yuma Enterprises. M/S H.B ENTERPRISES bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S GOODWILL SUPPLIERS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.