Competitor profile

M/S GLOBAL ENTERPRISES

They win 32% of what they bid, and 31% of the value they chase.

23tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
17 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
22
23 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.4 Cr
of ₹20.9 Cr bid — 30.5% conversion
Win rate
31.8%
of 22 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count22 bids
31.8%
31.8%
36.4%
Awarded731.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected731.8%
Lost836.4%
By value₹20.9 Cr
30.5%
28.7%
40.8%
Awarded₹6.4 Cr30.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.0 Cr28.7%
Lost₹8.5 Cr40.8%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD Special Division₹78.4 L12.3%
NREP RANCHI₹56.4 L8.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹6.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S INDIAN TRADERS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
AMIT KUMAR SINGH0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MAHI ASSOCIATE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹92.1 L
won head-to-head
04
M. FAIZ AHMAD0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/s RAJ CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedGLOBAL ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S GLOBAL ENTERPRISES

M/S GLOBAL ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 23 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 22 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 31.8% win rate — worth ₹6.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is WRD EinC Major-Med n Minor, at 78.9% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S INDIAN TRADERS, AMIT KUMAR SINGH and MAHI ASSOCIATE. M/S INDIAN TRADERS bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S GLOBAL ENTERPRISES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.