Competitor profile

AMIT KUMAR SINGH

They win 16% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

66tenders on record
10buyer authorities
1state
26 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
62
66 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
37 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹3.3 Cr
of ₹40.9 Cr bid — 8.1% conversion
Win rate
16.1%
of 62 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count62 bids
16.1%
24.2%
59.7%
Awarded1016.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1524.2%
Lost3759.7%
By value₹40.9 Cr
33.1%
58.8%
Awarded₹3.3 Cr8.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹13.5 Cr33.1%
Lost₹24.1 Cr58.8%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zila Parishad Giridih₹2.0 Cr59.6%
RWD EinC₹32.6 L9.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Jharkhand₹3.3 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAHID EQBAL0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MUKESH YADAV0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
BHAGAT CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
RAJENDRA MANDAL0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Jharkhand Kingdom Builder0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SRI PARSVNATH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAMIT KUMAR awardedOthers

About AMIT KUMAR SINGH

AMIT KUMAR SINGH appears as a bidder on 66 government tenders on record, from 10 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 62 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 16.1% win rate — worth ₹3.3 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zila Parishad Giridih, at 59.6% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jharkhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAHID EQBAL, MUKESH YADAV and BHAGAT CONSTRUCTION. SAHID EQBAL bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; AMIT KUMAR SINGH won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.